​The majority opinion in the Fourth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals rejecting the president’s request to reinstate his limited executive order on immigration borders on derangement. Chief Judge Gregory’s opinion states that the order, “drips with religious intolerance, animus and discrimination.” This is preposterous; it is not a legal judgment, it is fulmination of a deeply biased judge expressing a dangerous, personal opinion contaminated by animus towards Donald Trump.  Basing a decision on statements made by a candidate during a political campaign and the comment by a political partisan of the candidate (Rudy Giuliani) on the ideas of the candidate is a concept not found anywhere in American jurisprudence. Not only must this decision be overturned, Judge Gregory should be sanctioned. He ought to be removed from the bench but clearly that is not possible in these parlous times. It is nearly 65 years since I graduated from the University of Chicago Law School, 64 since my admission to the Illinois bar, 40 since my admission to the California bar, and 14 since my admission to the Bar of the U.S. supreme Court. Never in all these years have I heard of any opinion by a major American court so poisoned by a personal, emotional outpouring.

   

​A new and terrible disease—a pandemic really—has captured the mainstream media. It has been called “Trump Derangement Syndrome,” but these words fail to express the extent and the severity of this complaint. Reports are flooding that internet that people formerly deemed to be sensible and responsible journalists have been seen foaming at the mouth, hitting their heads against walls, decimating laptop keyboards and throwing their smartphones to the pavement and jumping on them—or tossing them out the windows of speeding cars. Generations of Democratic politicians have been sighted doing exactly the same.
There is no known treatment for this ailment, and unfortunately, otherwise sane ordinary Americans have contributed to this problem by cheering for these pathetic victims, encouraging their depredations and fostering the spread of the infectious fungi who incubate these deadly spores throughout the known world.
As these people splutter and spit, rave and rant, they have reached the nadir of American political history, They can no longer be taken seriously. While they tried to paint Trump as a clown, they themselves have become buffoons, not entertaining but embarrassing and utterly foolish. In fact, depraved.

If you hear something from a Republican politician, there's a 50/50 chance it's true. If a Democrat tells you something, there's an 80/20 chance it's false. The reason is simple: Democrats have learned to use all media, traditional, social and otherwise, in order not to inform, but to win. They know that the American Americans get their information from the deeply biased major TV networks other than Fox, and if they actually read a newspaper, with the partial exception of the Wall Street Journal, they will be consistently lied to.
And Liberal/Progressives always win the name game.  When they sold the public on calling homosexuals "gay" they eliminated all negative inferences and half the battle was won for same-sex marriage (an oxymoron if there ever was one).  When they invented "transgender" they overcame "transvestite." They also claim that gender is "fluid," clever but false. There is a growing crescendo of medical studies establishing clearly the vast differences between the sexes--that's right, sexes not genders. This does not mean that men or women should no be treated fairly; they should. But the idea that men and women are identical is utterly false, and dangerous in the bargain. Obviously, your daddy is not going to get pregnant and clearly the physiological conditions that enable a woman to carry a baby have a major effect on the construction of her body compared to a man's. I've hear a leading left-wing loon, I think her name is Cathy Areu, scream that equality means men and women are equally responsible for "caring" for a child. This, too, is nonsense. I've never seen or hear of a lactating male.  
Recently, the medical research community has acknowledged the great damage done to women's health by pretending they are identical to men. Why would women want to be -- unless the idea of bearing children is obnoxious to them. But fact are facts. Only women bear children, which makes them superior to men not equal to them. A woman may need male sperm to conceive, but she doesn't need a man any further to bear a child. 
In the past, a great deal of medical research was done only on men, based on the (mistaken) idea that women should not be subjected to the sometimes rigorous protocols in use. That is no longer part of the protocol. 
​I'll have more to say, later
​